The
Exhumation of Lee Harvey Oswald and the Norton Report
Part One-Michael Eddowes
By W. Tracy Parnell © 2003
A
small crowd gathered on the crisp autumn morning of October 4, 1981 at the
Born
in 1903 in
His
first book, The Man on Your Conscience, concerned the case of Timothy
Evans: a British laborer hanged in 1950 for the murder of his wife and infant
child. The book, which purported to show that an inquiry and subsequent report
concerning the Evans’ case was flawed, and that the British government had
suppressed evidence, caused a firestorm in
Despite
his unqualified success with the Evans case, Eddowes was reluctant to take on
similar projects.[4]
However, in 1962 Eddowes became involved by chance in what would later become
known as the British Profumo Scandal. This experience would lead to a trilogy
of books whose thesis would eventually encompass the Chinese invasion of
Eddowes
involvement in the scandal began when osteopath Stephen Ward treated him at his
In
1963, Eddowes published a letter alleging that Ivanov had asked Keeler to
obtain the date of delivery of nuclear warheads to
Eddowes’
first of three assassination books was the 1975 self-published Khrushchev
Killed Kennedy mostly written in
In
1976, Eddowes published Nov. 22, How They Killed Kennedy in
Eddowes’
first course of action was to contact Dr. Felix Gwozdz, the Medical Examiner
for
Working
through his attorneys, Eddowes contacted Dr. Linda Norton, Assistant Dallas
County Medical Examiner, in August of 1979. He again made his case for
exhumation, this time suggesting that Norton’s office take jurisdiction over
the case. Norton was apparently impressed by Eddowes’ argument and after
consulting with Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Charles Petty, managed to obtain
copies of Oswald’s military medical and dental records in anticipation of a
possible examination.[10]
Shortly after obtaining the records from the
In
October 1979, Dr. Petty contacted Tarrant County Medical Examiner Nizan
Peerwani (who had replaced the deceased Gwozdz) asking that the body of Oswald
be exhumed and brought to
Meanwhile,
two men with close ties to the JFK case weighed in on the possibility of an
Oswald exhumation. G. Robert Blakey, who had served as chief counsel to the
recently disbanded House Select Committee on Assassinations said of Eddowes’
work, “I have read his book and it is trash. This whole question is a non
question.” Blakey continued, “The committee carefully looked into the so-called
two Oswalds theory… There is nothing to it.”[14]
Similarly, Earl Rose, who had performed the original autopsy on Oswald, told
UPI that he was certain of the identity of the corpse because of fingerprint
comparisons that he made.[15]
In
November of 1979, the Tarrant County District Attorney’s office rejected
Eddowes’ offer to pay a $15,000 deposit on an insurance bond for Oswald’s
exhumation. Assistant District Attorney Marvin Collins informed Eddowes through
his attorneys that the offer for a total indemnification bond of $100,000 was
insufficient considering the legal risks involved.[16]
By February of 1980, the exhumation battle seemed to be over when
After
a few months of relative silence, Eddowes directed his attention toward Marina
Oswald[*]
and in August of 1980, she signed a consent form for Dr. Petty to perform an
autopsy as a private case with Eddowes to pay all expenses. On August 14,
Robert Oswald (brother of Lee Oswald) obtained a temporary restraining order
from the 141st District Court halting the exhumation.[18]
About a month later, the same court granted Robert’s injunction against Eddowes
to block the exhumation while denying his motion against Rosehill cemetery
where the grave was located.[19]
Dr. Petty was dismissed from the suit when the judge ruled that he had to be
sued in his home county.[20]
In
the meantime, the Dallas County Commissioners publicly stated their opposition
to the use of any county facility for the examination citing “adverse
publicity”. On October 2, 1980 Eddowes attorneys announced plans to appeal the
injunction won by Robert Oswald. While awaiting the results of the appeal,
attorneys for all parties were kept busy by numerous motions and counter
motions. In August of 1981,
On
September 17, 1981, the Court of Appeals heard the case. Finding that Robert
had no “justiciable” interest in the exhumation, they reversed the decision of
the 141st District Court, paving the way for the exhumation to take
place. However, on September 23, Robert again won a temporary injunction from
the
As
events progressed, attorneys for Marina and Eddowes became convinced that they
would ultimately prevail and preparations for the exhumation were made. Dr.
Norton was chosen as chief forensic pathologist because of her familiarity with
the case and the parties involved.
Backhoes
began the process with the onset of sufficient daylight at about 6:30 am Central
time. The primary concern of those in charge of the physical exhumation was an
expeditious removal of the remains for both security reasons and to minimize
the impact on daily operations at Rose Hill.[25]
The
initial plan called for the removal of the concrete vault containing the
casket, which would then be transported to the vault company for opening. The
casket itself would subsequently be removed from the vault and driven to nearby
The
casket, covered by a specially made cardboard lid, was carefully slid onto a
wooden platform that had been placed in the trench. The entire platform was
then raised and placed in a waiting hearse for the trip to Baylor. The
completed exhumation took about two and a half hours, by which time the small
crowd had turned into a large one that included members of the news media.
Rumors had circulated among the media that the examination would take place at
the Dallas Institute of Forensic Science. Therefore, when the hearse started
toward Dallas, many members of the press traveled to that facility instead of
Baylor. This was a fortuitous development from the viewpoint of the examination
team as it facilitated a quick and somewhat clandestine transfer of the remains
to Baylor.[27]
The
remains arrived at Baylor at about 9:20 am CDT[28]
and the examination began at 10:00 am.[29]
The casket was opened and it was obvious that the water that had so damaged the
coffin had caused marked decomposition of the body as well. The exposed ribs
crumbled with only mild pressure and the beige viscera bag[†]
containing the organs (placed in the bag after the original ’63 autopsy by Dr.
Earl Rose) was in full view.[30]
Mortician
Paul Groody, who had embalmed and buried Oswald in 1963, remained in the
examination room long enough to identify the remains as those he had worked
with.[31]
Groody used several observations during the brief time he was in the room in
order to make this identification. First, he observed rings on the hands of the
body that were placed there by Marina Oswald. The rings, a gold wedding band
and a red stone ring, were the same and seemed to be in the same position as he
remembered. Secondly, Groody recognized the aforementioned viscera bag that was
not in common use in 1963.[32]
Finally, Groody noticed that the clothes were those that he had placed on
Oswald before he was laid to rest.[33]
After making his identification, Groody promptly left the examination room.[34]
After a cursory
examination of the body, it was time for the Norton team to do the work that
would ensure a proper identification of the remains. The identification would
be made primarily using dental records. However, the team was aware of two
additional procedures performed on the skull of the deceased that could
strengthen their findings if present. One was a craniotomy incision made by Dr.
Earl Rose as a normal part of the autopsy he performed in 1963. The other was a
defect in the mastoid process resulting from an operation Oswald had as a
child. If both anomalies (resulting from procedures that occurred nearly twenty
years apart) could be identified, it would provide convincing proof of the
identity of the corpse.
The
head was removed from the body in order to facilitate the examination by an
incision near the second cervical vertebral interspace.[35]
The autopsy saw cut was indeed present in the usual position providing the
first confirmation that this was Oswald. The doctors also observed the defect
from Oswald’s childhood mastoid operation, which was described as “irregularly
ovoid” and about one by one-half centimeters in size.[36]
Using photos taken that day, Dr. Vincent DiMaio (a member of the Norton team)
told the author recently that the mastoid defect was normal in appearance. He
also identified the craniotomy cut as the one he remembered.[37]
Having
confirmed the autopsy cut and mastoid defect, the Norton team moved on to the
dental examination. The teeth were cleaned and photographs and x-rays taken. The
two forensic odontologists, Drs. Cottone and Sopher, then charted the complete
dentition independently and dental casts were made.[38]
The team recorded identical radiographic morphology in three teeth and similar
radiographic morphology in three others. Additionally, similar pulpal anatomy
was noted in one other tooth. A positive dental identification of Lee Harvey
Oswald was therefore made by the team on the strength of the identical and
similar factors in the dentition and the lack of any unexplainable inconsistencies.[39] A
news conference was held at about 3:00 pm to announce the findings of the team.
Linda Norton stepped before the cameras and made the following statement:
“The
findings of the team are as follows: We independently and as a team have
concluded beyond any doubt, and I mean beyond any doubt, that the individual
buried under the name of Lee Harvey Oswald in
The
Norton team was confident that their examination would end any further
speculation about the identity of the corpse. Dr. Irvin Sopher said, “… is no
doubt that the in-life records and the X-rays match the body in the casket.”
Sopher added that the matching of dental records can be “as exact as a
fingerprint”. Dr. Norton stated that a “mist of mold” covered the body proving
the remains had not been tampered with.[41]
After
nearly three years of legal action and considerable expense, Michael Eddowes
was gracious in defeat. Commenting through his attorneys, he stated, “Though
surprised, I am in no way disappointed in the apparent disproving of my
evidence of imposture. Rather, I have accomplished my objective in obtaining
the exhumation and I am glad for those who have steadfastly maintained the
contrary for whatever reason.”[42]
Marina Oswald was “totally satisfied” with the results of the exam. She told
UPI, “I always intended for this to be a private matter, but it became public
because of circumstances beyond my control. It’s very unfortunate it became
such a public event. Now I have my answers…”[43]
The main characters in the drama that unfolded
that autumn day had no way of knowing that the controversy about who was in the
[*] Marina Oswald used her married name Porter at the time of the exhumation. She has since retaken the Oswald name and that will be used for the purposes of this series of articles.
[†]
Commenting on the appearance of the organs in
the bag, Dr. Vincent DiMaio, who was one of the four members of the Norton
examination team, told the author “Essentially most of the tissue was the
consistency of cream cheese”.
[1]
[2] Michael Eddowes, Khrushchev Killed Kennedy (Self-published, 1975), Author’s Preface.
[3] Michael Eddowes, The Oswald File (New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1977), back cover.
[4] Ibid.
[5]
[6] Ibid.
[7] Michael Eddowes, The Oswald File (New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1977), Prologue.
[8]
[9] Linda E. Norton, James A. Cottone, Irvin M. Sopher, and Vincent J. M. DiMaio, “The Exhumation and Identification of Lee Harvey Oswald,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, Volume 29, No. 1, Jan. 1984, p. 20.
[10] Linda E. Norton, James A. Cottone, Irvin M. Sopher, and Vincent J. M. DiMaio, “The Exhumation and Identification of Lee Harvey Oswald,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, Volume 29, No. 1, Jan. 1984, p. 20.
[11] “Officials Seek to Exhume Body in Oswald’s Grave,” The New York Times, October 19, 1979.
[12] Ibid.
[13] Norton et al, op. cit., p. 20.
[14] “Expert is Sure Body is Oswald’s,” The New York Times, October 20, 1979.
[15] “Pathologist Says Autopsy Verified Oswald Identity,” The New York Times, October 29, 1979.
[16] “Oswald Exhumation Bid Lost,” The New York Times, November 25, 1979.
[17] Norton et al, op. cit., p. 20.
[18] Norton et al, op. cit., p. 21.
[19] “Brother Wins Appeal to Halt Oswald Exhumation,” The New York Times, September 20, 1980.
[20] Norton et al, op. cit. p. 21.
[21] Ibid.
[22] Ibid.
[23] Ibid., pp. 21-22.
[24] “Body Exhumed, Ruled Oswald’s,” The Washington Post, October 5, 1981; p. A1.
[25] Linda E. Norton, James A. Cottone, Irvin M. Sopher, and Vincent J. M. DiMaio, “The Exhumation and Identification of Lee Harvey Oswald,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, Volume 29, No. 1, Jan. 1984, p. 23.
[26] Ibid., pp. 21-23.
[27] Ibid., p. 23.
[28] Ibid.
[29] Ibid., p. 24.
[30] Ibid.
[31] Ibid., p. 23.
[32]
Gary Mack, “Who Was
Really in Oswald’s Grave? Part One.” Coverups!, February 1983, p. 1;
Norton, op. cit., p. 24.
[33] “Episode 4-The Patsy”. The Men Who Killed Kennedy. The History Channel, September 2001.
[34] Gary Mack, “Who Was Really in Oswald’s Grave? Part 2.” Coverups!, March 1983, p. 3.
[35]
Norton et al, op.
cit., p. 25; This procedure and the entire examination were filmed by Hampton
Hall at the request of Marina Oswald and her friend John Cullins and his
personal physician viewed the tape and confirmed that the head was indeed cut
from the body and not loose in the coffin as sometimes claimed. (Coverups!,
Part 3).
[36] Ibid.
[37] Author Interview with Dr. Vincent Di Maio, May 24, 2001.
[38] Norton et al, op. cit., p. 25.
[39] Ibid., p. 32.
[40] “Episode 4-The Patsy”. The Men Who Killed Kennedy. The History Channel, September 2001.
[41] “Body Exhumed, Ruled Oswald’s,” The Washington Post, October 5, 1981
[42] Ibid.
[43] Ibid.